<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
	<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>MYLabourLaw - Useful Reads</title>
		<link>http://www.mylabourlaw.net/</link>
		<description></description>
<item>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
				<title>The Collective Bargaining Process</title>
				<link>http://www.mylabourlaw.net/useful-reads/43-the-collective-bargaining-process.php</link>
				<guid>http://www.mylabourlaw.net/useful-reads/43-the-collective-bargaining-process.php</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>(a) Once         a Trade Union is accorded recognition under Section 9 of I.R. Act the         Union has the right to invite the employer to commence collective bargaining         on behalf of all the employees (except those in the managerial, executive,         confidential, personnel and security capacity). The Union has to submit         its proposal for a Collective Agreement. The proposals will contain terms         and conditions of employment and other benefits which the Union asks for,         on behalf of the employees.
</p>]]></description>
			</item><item>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:33:05 GMT</pubDate>
				<title>Brief History Of Labour Court</title>
				<link>http://www.mylabourlaw.net/useful-reads/41-brief-history-of-labour-court.php</link>
				<guid>http://www.mylabourlaw.net/useful-reads/41-brief-history-of-labour-court.php</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>1. As far           as can be ascertained from reference to old legislation, the special           provisions of the law giving labourers the right to go to a 'Labour           Court' first appeared in Malaya in the Perak Enactment No. 24 of 1899.           It is believed that there is reference to a 'Labour Court' in an older           Enactment, but no copy of this can now be traced. These 'Labour Courts'           in Malaya were originally created for the purpose of inquiring into           complaints made by Chinese labourers, particularly those employed on           tin mines. These special provisions were repeated in the F.M.S. Labour           Enactments of 1904, 1910 and 1923 and continued, in a practically unchanged           form, to give only Chinese labourers this special right. However, in           1925 an amendment gave non- Chinese the right to join Chinese labourers           in their complaints against their employers in the 'Labour Court',           provided that these non-Chinese were employed on the same place of           employment on which not less than 20 Chinese labourers were employed.           The position then remained unchanged until 1949 when the section was           made equally applicable to labourers of all races.
</p>]]></description>
			</item><item>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
				<title>Constructive Dismissal</title>
				<link>http://www.mylabourlaw.net/useful-reads/42-constructive-dismissal.php</link>
				<guid>http://www.mylabourlaw.net/useful-reads/42-constructive-dismissal.php</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The common          law has always recognised the right of an employee to terminate his contract          of service and therefore to consider himself as discharged from further          obligations if the employer is guilty of such breach as effects the foundation          of the contract or if the employer has evinced or shown an intention not          to be bound by it any longer. It was an attempt to enlarge the right of          the employee of unilateral termination of his contract beyond the perimeter          of the common law by an unreasonable conduct of his employer that the          expression 'constructive dismissal' was used.&quot;
</p>]]></description>
			</item></channel>
		</rss>
